目的：探讨使用Horwitz 方程判断分析方法是否满足其预期用途的局限之处。方法：在介绍Horwitz方程内容的基础上,通过查找收集大量国内外相关文献,从不同方面分析Horwitz 方程作为方法验证接受标准的不足之处。结果：（1）Horwitz 方程预测值未包含方法所有的变异来源;（2）Horwitz 方程不允许用不确定度来评估方法性能;（3）Horwitz 方程未与产品限度范围相联系。结论：使用Horwitz 方程作为判断标准是不够合理的,应基于分析方法的总变异进行判定。文中介绍了方法的预测区间或容忍区间,以及方法能力指数以用于判断方法是否满足预期用途。
Objective: To discuss the limitations of using the predicted value of Horwitz equation to judge whether the analysis method meets the intended use. Methods: On the basis of introducing the content of the Horwitz equation,the limitations of using the Horwitz equation as accepetance criteria of method validation were analyzed from different points by searching and collecting a large number of domestic and foreign relevant literatures. Results: （1） The predicted value of Horwitz equation did not contain all the method variables; （2） The Horwitz equation did not allow using the uncertainty to evaluate the method performance;（3） The Horwitz equation was not related to product's limits or ranges. Conclusion: Using Horwitz equation as the judging criteria is not reasonable,it should be depended on the total variability of method. The predictive interval,tolerance interval and method capability index were introduced to determine if the method meets the intended use.
[1] 中华人民共和国药典2020 年版.四部[S].2020:327<9101>
ChP2020.Vol Ⅳ[S].2020:327<9101>
[2] HORWITZ W,KAMPS LR,BOYER KW.Quality assurance in the analysis of foods and trace constituents[J].J Assoc Off Anal Chem,1980,63(6):1344
[3] HORWITZ W,ALBERT R.The Horwitz ratio(HorRat):a useful index of method performance with respect to precision[J].J AOAC Int,2006,89(4):1095
[4] HORWITZ W.Evaluation of analytical methods used for regulation of foods and drugs[J].Anal Chem,1982,54(1):67
[5] International Organization for Standardization(ISO),ISO 13528:2015.Statistical Methods for Use in Proficiency Testing by Interlaboratory ComparisonsISO 13528:2015.Statistical Methods for Use in Proficiency Testing by Interlaboratory Comparisons[S].2015
[6] HEYDEN YV,NIJHUIS A,SMEYERS-VERBEKE J,et al.Guidance for robustness/ruggedness tests in method validation[J].J Pharm Biomed Anal,2001,24(5-6):723
[7] HORWITZ W,ALBERT R,NESHEIM S.Reliability of mycotoxin assays—an update[J].J AOAC Int,1993,76(3):461
[8] LINSINGER TP,JOSEPHS RD.Limitations of the application of the Horwitz equation[J].Trends Anal Chem,2006,25(11):1125
[9] WEHLING P,DEVRIES JW.On the use of the Horwitz ratio (HorRat) as an acceptance criterion for dietary fiber collaborative studies[J].J AOAC Int,2012,95(5):1541
[10] International Organization for Standardization(ISO),ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurements[S].1995
[11] THOMPSON M.The characteristic function,a method-specific alternative to the Horwitz function[J].J AOAC Int,2012,95(6):1803
[12] ICH Q2(R1).Validation of analytical procedure:text and methodology[S].2005
[13] DESMONI E,BRUNETTI B.Uncertainty of measurement and conformity assessment:a review[J].Anal Bioanal Chem,2011,400(6):1729
[14] 谭德讲,朱容蝶,耿颖,等.分析方法验证国内外技术指南现状分析[J].药物分析杂志,2019,39(2):191
TAN DJ,ZHU RD,GENG Y,et al.Analysis of the current situation of domestic and foreign guidelines for method validation[J].Chin J Pharm Anal,2019,39(2):191
[15] OMCL Network of the Council of Europe.PA/PH/OMCL(14)89R. Evaluation and Reporting of Results.Annex 2A:Examples of Re-Test Programmes for Quantitative Tests[EB/OL].[2019-11-14].https://www.edqm.eu
[16] USP 41-NF 36.General Chapter[S].2018:7622 <1210>
[17] FDA.Analytical Procedures and Methds Validation for Drugs and Biologics Guidance for Industry[S/OL].[2019-11-14].https://www.Fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm
[18] 谭德讲,朱容蝶,耿颖,等.判断定量类理化分析方法满足预期用途的标准探讨[J].药物分析杂志,2019,39(2):14
TAN DJ,ZHU RD,GENG Y,et al.Discussion about the criteria of quantitative physicochemical analytical methods for satisfying their intended use[J].Chin J Pharm Anal,2019,39(2):14
