Ingredient Analysis

Comparative study on chemical components of the first-cut velvet antler and reborn velvet antler based on principal component analysis and discriminant analysis*

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Special Animal and Plant Sciences, China Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130112, China;
    2. College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China;
    3. Deer Product Quality Supervision and Testing Center of Jinlin Province, Changchun 130600, China

Received date: 2020-06-30

  Online published: 2024-05-31

Abstract

Objective:To study the differences in chemical constituents between the first-cut velvet antler and the reborn velvet antler,evaluate the quality and distinguish the first-cut velvet antler and reborn velvet antler. Methods:A variety of analytical techniques were used to determine and compare the polysaccharides,crude protein,collagen,chondroitin sulfate,amino acids,fatty acids,mineral elements,biogenic amines and nucleosides in the first-cut velvet antler and reborn velvet antler,and SPSS were used for principal component analysis and discriminant analysis. Results:The results of 5 batches of samples showed that the contents of polysaccharide, crude protein,amino acid,collagen,fatty acid,mineral element,biogenic amine,nucleoside and chondroitin sulfate in the first-cut velvet antler were 8.14 g·kg-1,563.42 g·kg-1,214.95 g·kg-1,9.10 g·kg-1,485.75 g·kg-1,13.01 g·kg-1,108.30 g·kg-1,201.64 mg·kg-1 and 2.47 g·kg-1,respectively;the contents in reborn velvet antler were 8.43 g·kg-1,561.15 g·kg-1,204.92 g·kg-1,7.69 g·kg-1,503.36 g·kg-1,11.64 g·kg-1,101.37 g·kg-1,208.03 mg·kg-1 and 2.17 g·kg-1,respectively. Conclusion:The results of principal component analysis with 9 chemical components as variables showed that the scores of first-cut velvet antler were higher than those of the reborn velvet antler. The discriminant analysis could classify the first-cut velvet antler and reborn velvet antler. This study provides a reference for the establishment of quality standards system of the first-cut velvet antler and reborn velvet antler in the future.

Cite this article

LIU Song-xin, GONG Rui-ze, WANG Ze-shuai, BI Xiao-dong, LU Si, SUN Yin-shi . Comparative study on chemical components of the first-cut velvet antler and reborn velvet antler based on principal component analysis and discriminant analysis*[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2021 , 41(2) : 236 -243 . DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2021.02.07

References

[1] 中华人民共和国药典 2015 年版.一部华人民共和国药典 2015 年版.一部[S].2015:323 ChP 2015.Vol Ⅰ[S].2015:323
[2] 刘松鑫,宫瑞泽,陆雨顺,等.不同品种、规格鹿茸的化学成分和药理作用研究进展[J].中草药,2020,51(3):806
LIU SX,GONG RZ,LU YS,et al.Research progress on chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of different Cervi Cornu Pantotrichum[J].Chin Tradit Herbal Drugs,2020,51(3):806
[3] 雒伟伟,赵海平,齐晓妍,等.鹿茸药材鉴定和质量控制的研究进展[J].中国中药杂志,2017,42(21):4110
LUO WW,ZHAO HP,QI XY,et al.Research progress on identification and quality control of Cervi Cornu Pantotrichum[J]. Chin J Chin Mater Med,2017,42(21):4110
[4] 张嵩,李峰.不同规格鹿茸商品药材中氨基酸含量分析[J].中国中药杂志,2013,38(12):1919
ZHANG S,LI F.Determination of amino acids in Cornu Cervi Pantotrichum of different specifications[J].Chin J Chin Mater Med,2013,38(12):1919
[5] 杨丽娟,陈宏伟,张剑云,等.塔里木马鹿茸氨基酸与钙、磷含量的测定[J].江苏农业科学,2010,38(4):319
YANG LJ,CHEN HW,ZHANG JY,et al.Determination of amino acid,calcium and phosphorus contents of tarim red deer antler[J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci,2010,38(4):319
[6] 宫瑞泽,王燕华,祁玉丽,等.不同加工方式对鹿茸中水溶性多糖含量及单糖组成的影响[J].色谱,2019,37(2):194
GONG RZ,WANG YH,QI YL,et al .Effects of different processing methods on water soluble polysaccharide contents and monosaccharide compositions in Cervi Cornu Pantotrichum[J]. Chin J Chromatogr,2019,37(2):194
[7] 王燕华,张秀莲,赵卉,等.不同加工方式对鹿茸中粗蛋白与水解氨基酸量的影响研究[J].中草药,2017,48(15):3085
WANG YH,ZHANG XL,ZHAO H,et al.Effects of different processing methods on content of crude protein and hydrolytic amino acids in Cervi Cornu Pantotrichum[J].Chin Tradit Herbal Drugs,2017,48(15):3085
[8] 宫瑞泽,赵卉,曲迪,等.不同产地加工及炮制方法对鹿茸中胶原蛋白含量的影响[J].食品科学,2019,40(22):1
GONG RZ,ZHAO H,QU D,et al.Effects of different processing methods and processed products on collagen content of Cornu Cervi Pantotrichum[J].Food Sci,2019,40(22):1
[9] 刘松鑫,宫瑞泽,王泽帅,等.不同形态梅花鹿鹿茸的化学成分对比研究[J].中草药,2020,51(1):67
LIU SX,GONG RZ,WANG ZS,et al.Comparative study on chemical constituents of Cervi Cornu Pantotrichum in different forms of Cervus nipport[J].Chin Tradit Herb Drugs,2020,51(1): 67
[10] 王燕华,姜英,孙印石,等.不同加工方式的鹿茸无机元素含量的比较[J].药物分析杂志,2018,38(1):104
WANG YH,JIANG Y,SUN YS,et al.Comparative analysis of inorganic elements in antlers with different processing methods[J]. Chin J Pharm Anal,2018,38(1):104
[11] 王燕华,孙印石,王玉方,等.UPLC 法测定不同加工方式鹿茸中的生物胺成分[J].分析测试学报,2018,37(9):995
WANG YH,SUN YS,WANG YF,et al.Simultaneous determination of biogenic amine in Cervi Cornu Pantotrichum processed with different methods by UPLC[J].J Instrum Anal,2018,37(9):995
[12] 孙印石,王燕华,王玉方,等.UPLC 法测定不同加工方式梅花鹿鹿茸中的核苷类成分[J].中草药,2018,49(4):840
SUN YS,WANG YH,WANG YF,et al.Simultaneous determination of nucleosides and nucleobases in Cervi Cornu Pantotrichum of sika deer (Cervus nippon) with different processing methods by UPLC[J].Chin Tradit Herbal Drugs,2018,49(4):840
[13] 王燕华,金春爱,孙印石,等.不同加工方式的鹿茸脂肪酸的气相色谱分析[J].中草药,2017,48(12):2431
WANG YH,JIN CA,SUN YS,et al.Analysis on fatty acids of Cervi Cornu Pantotrichum with different processing methods by gas chromatography[J].Chin Tradit Herbal Drugs,2017,48(12): 2431
[14] 孙伟丽,赵海平,张国坤,等.不同加工方式对梅花鹿三叉茸不同区段矿物质元素含量的影响研究[J].中草药,2018,49(16): 3821
SUN WL,ZHAO HP,ZHANG GK,et al.Effects of different processing methods on content of mineral elements in Cervi Cornu Pantotrichum of Cervus nippon[J].Chin Tradit Herb Drugs,2018, 49(16):3821
[15] 陆城宇,李俊松,狄留庆,等.不同产地桑叶氨基酸、核苷、生物碱成分的含量测定及多元统计分析[J].中国现代应用药学, 2020,37(9):1052
LU CY,LI JS,DI LQ,et al.Determination and multivariate statistical analysis of amino acids,nucleosides and alkaloid in mulberry leaves from different origins[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm, 2020,37(9):1052
[16] 叶协锋,魏跃伟,杨宇熙,等.基于主成分分析和聚类分析的烤烟质量评价模型构建[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2009,25(3):268
YE XF,WEI YW,YANG YX,et al.Model of the quality evaluation of flue-cured tobacco based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J].Sys Sci Comprehens Stu Agric,2009,25(3): 268
[17] 陈和明,吕复兵,李佐,等.蝴蝶兰品质性状综合评价体系的构建[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(8):83
CHEN HM,L FB,LI Z,et al.Establishment of comprehensive evaluation system on quality traits in Phalaenopsis[J].J Chin Agric Univ,2017,22(8):83
[18] 孙伟杰,王铭,杨洋,等.基于化学指纹图谱和多指标成分含量测定的梅花鹿鹿茸质量评价[J].中华中医药学刊,2020,38(3): 188
SUN WJ,WANG M,YANG Y,et al.HPLC fingerprints integrated with quantitative determination of multi-components for quality controlof pilos antler[J].Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med,2020,38(3):188
[19] 王任晶. 基于多成分分析梅花鹿饮片质量标准的研究[D].长春:长春中医药大学,2020
WANG RJ.Study on Quality Standards of Sika Antler Pieces based on Multi-component Analysis[D].Changchun:Changchun University of Chinese Medicine,2020
[20] 刘雪莹. 不同规格鹿茸饮片质量分析研究[D].长春:长春中医药大学,2019
LIU XY.Quality Analysis of Different Specifications of Antler Pieces[D].Changchun:Changchun University of Chinese Medicine,2019
[21] 何慧楠. 鹿茸药材质量评价研究[D].长春:长春中医药大学,2019
HE HN.Quality Evaluation of Commercial Deer Velvet[D]. Changchun:Changchun University of Chinese Medicine,2019
[22] 魏越. 不同规格、等级鹿茸商品药材质量评价研究[D].沈阳:辽宁中医药大学,2018
WEI Y.Research on the Quality Evaluation of Commercial Deer Antler with Different Specifications and Grades[D].Shenyang: Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2018
[23] 刘威,龚伟,张嵩,等.基于多元统计分析的鹿茸品质评价[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2018,24(14):57
LIU W,GONG W,ZHANG S,et al.Quality evaluation of Cervi Cornu Pantotrichum based on multivariate statistical analysis[J]. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Form,2018,24(14):57
[24] 宋佳,张振秋,李峰.柱前衍生HPLC 对鹿茸多糖中单糖组成的研究[J].中华中医药学刊,2018,36(9):2227
SONG J,ZHANG ZQ,LI F,et al.Study of monosaccharide composition from antler polysaccharides derived from pre-column[J].Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med,2018,36(9):2227
Outlines

/