Safety Monitoring

Study on the interaction between DNA and impurities 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and its dipolymer and metabolite using QSAR model, ultraviolet spectroscopy and molecular docking technique*

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs, National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing 100176, China;
    2. New Drug Safety Evaluation Center, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China;
    3. Beijing Union-Genius Pharmaceutical Technology Development Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176, China

Received date: 2023-06-28

  Online published: 2024-06-24

Abstract

Objective: To study the interaction between DNA and impurities 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF), its dipolymer 5,5'-oxydimethylenebis (2-furfural) (OMBF), and its metabolite 5-sulfooxymethylfurfural (5-SMF), and to provide theoretical basis to the research of the mechanism of potential risk of DNA damage and genotoxicity. Methods: The possibility of DNA binding and its warning structure of genotoxic of 5-HMF, OMBF and 5-SMF were predicted by using QSAR models, then the interaction between the three impurities and calf thymus DNA (ctDNA) was determined by using an ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy to evaluate the possible mode of action for the spectral changes, and the simulated docking of three impurities and double-stranded DNA were finally investigated by using a computational molecular docking technology, the interaction between the three impuirities and DNA was intuitively presented, and the stability of the binding of three impurities and DNA were compared. Results: The results predicted by four QSAR models showed that all three impurities had the ability to bind with DNA (structural alert: furan) and the plausibility to induce mutagenicity and carcinogenicity (structural alert: aldehyde). 5-HMF, OMBF and 5-SMF showed a hypochromic effect on the UV spectrum of ctDNA with the degree of 8.2%, 22.6% and 8.7%, respectively, and blue shift with distance of 1.2 nm, 3.5 nm, and 1.0 nm. It demonstrated that three impurities could interact with ctDNA in the form of minor groove binding, accompanied by a π-π interaction with base pairs. The results obtained from computer-aided molecular docking simulation illustrated that three impurities could bind in the minor groove of DNA, hydrogen bonds with the base pairs, and the π-π interaction with the base pairs were found on OMBF and 5-SMF. By comparing the average of interaction energies of small impurities and DNA indicated that OMBF was the strongest, and then was the 5-SMF and 5-HMF was the weakest. Conclusion: The above results show that, the three impurities are capable to interact with DNA to form produce van der Waals force (minor groove binding), hydrogen bonds and π-π interaction and all may form impurity DNA complexes with DNA in a non-covalent way, thus inducing some degree of damage to the structure of DNA. This exploratory research has been conducted on the possible interactions of 5-HMF, OMBF or 5-SMF with DNA, and the potential mechanisms of DNA damage and genotoxicity are explored form the molecular level, providing new insights into the research on the genotoxicity of small molecular weight impurities.

Cite this article

LIN Ni, ZHANG Jia-ning, LIU Li, JIN Hong-tao, WANG San-long, LIU Ying . Study on the interaction between DNA and impurities 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and its dipolymer and metabolite using QSAR model, ultraviolet spectroscopy and molecular docking technique*[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2023 , 43(7) : 1221 -1228 . DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2023.07.16

References

[1] FARAG MR, ALAGAWANY M, BIN-JUMAH M, et al. The toxicological aspects of the heat-borne toxicant 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in animals: a review[J].Molecules, 2020, 25(8):1941
[2] LI YX, LI Y, QIAN ZJ, et al. In vitro antioxidant activity of 5-HMF isolated from marine red alga Laurencia undulata in free-radical-mediated oxidative systems[J].J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2009, 19(11):1319
[3] KOSZUCKA A, NOWAK A. Thermal processing food-related toxicants: a review[J].Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2019, 59(22):3579
[4] LIN N, LIU TT, LIN L, et al. Comparison of in vivo immunomodulatory effects of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and 5, 5'-oxydimethylenebis (2-furfural)[J].Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 2016, 81: 500
[5] ZANG Q, GAO Y, HUANG L, et al. Rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for the quantitative determination of potentially harmful substance 5, 5'-oxydimethylenebis (2-furfural) in traditional Chinese medicine injections[J].Acta Pharm Sin B, 2018, 8(2):235
[6] SHAPLA UM, SOLAYMAN M, ALAM N, et al. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) levels in honey and other food products: effects on bees and human health[J].Chem Cent J, 2018, 12(1):35
[7] 臧清策, 何菁菁, 白进发, 等. 快速筛查中药注射液中有害物质5-羟甲基糠醛的LC-MS/MS方法及其质量评价研究[J].药学学报, 2013, 48(11):1705
ZANG QC, HE JJ, BAI JF, et al. LC-MS/MS method for rapid screening of harmful substance 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in traditional Chinese medicine injection and its quality evaluation[J].Acta Pharm Sin, 2013, 48(11):1705
[8] DURLING LJ, BUSK L, HELLMAN BE. Evaluation of the DNA damaging effect of the heat-induced food toxicant 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) in various cell lines with different activities of sulfotransferases[J].Food Chem Toxicol, 2009, 47(4):880
[9] SHAPLA UM, SOLAYMAN M, ALAM N, et al. 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) levels in honey and other food products: effects on bees and human health[J].Chem Cent J, 2018, 12(1):35
[10] SURH YJ, LIEM A, MILLER JA, et al. 5-Sulfooxymethylfurfural as a possible ultimate mutagenic and carcinogenic metabolite of the Maillard reaction product, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural[J].Carcinogenesis, 1994, 15(10):2375
[11] MORALES FJ. Hydroxymethylfurfural(HMF) and Related Compounds[M]// Process-Induced Food Toxicants: Occurrence, Formation, Mitigation, and Health Risks, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008
[12] 林铌, 叶倩, 耿兴超, 等. 杂质5-羟甲基糠醛及其二聚体和代谢产物遗传毒性研究[J].中国药物警戒, 2023, 20(2):1672
LIN N, YE Q, GENG XC, et al. Genotoxicity of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and its dipolymer and metabolite[J].Chin J Pharmacovigi, 2023, 20(2):1672
[13] LI Z, PEARLMAN AH, HSIEH P. DNA mismatch repair and the DNA damage response[J].DNA Repair(Amst), 2016, 38: 94
[14] FUJII S, SOBOL RW, FUCHS RP. Double-strand breaks: when DNA repair events accidentally meet[J].DNA Repair(Amst), 2022, 112: 103303
[15] CHENG YZ, XIAO LIX, PIN Y. Studies on DNA binding to metal complexes of Sal2trien[J].Biochemistry(Mosc), 2007, 72(1):37
[16] 朱文泉, 马健, 李敏. 基因毒性杂质的挑战与控制策略——从ICH指导纲领到实际操作层面[J].中国食品药品监管, 2020(12):29
ZHU WQ, MA J, LI M. The challenge and control strategy of genotoxic impurities—from Ich guideline to practical operation[J].China Food Drug Adm Mag, 2020(12):29
[17] NELSON SM, FERGUSON LR, DENNY WA. Non-covalent ligand/DNA interactions: minor groove binding agents[J].Mutat Res, 2007, 623(1-2):24
Outlines

/