成分分析

一测多评法同时测定丁公藤不同炮制品中7个活性成分含量*

展开
  • 1.安徽医学高等专科学校,合肥 230601;
    2.广西中医药大学,南宁 530001
第一作者 Tel:15277189690;E-mail:gxyanghl2005@126.com

收稿日期: 2024-02-20

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-21

基金资助

*国家自然科学基金(81860711);广西高校中青年教师科研基础能力提升项目(2020KY07034);广西壮瑶药重点实验室(桂科基[2014]32号(20-065-14));广西壮瑶药重点实验室开放课题(GXZYKF2020A-10);广西中医药大学创新训练项目(DXS2019054);2021年广西中医药大学校级科研项目(2021MS004);中药炮制技术传承基地(桂中医药发【2022】9号);2023年国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(202310600012)

Simultaneous determination of 7 active ingredients in Erycibes Caulis with different processing technology by QAMS*

Expand
  • 1. Anhui Medical College, Hefei 230601, China;
    2. Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning 530001, China

Received date: 2024-02-20

  Online published: 2024-06-21

摘要

目的: 建立一测多评法同时测定丁公藤及其炮制品中7个活性成分含量,并分析炮制对其影响。方法: 采用超高效液相色谱法(UPLC),以绿原酸为参照物,建立新绿原酸、东莨菪苷、东莨菪内酯、异绿原酸B、异绿原酸A和异绿原酸C的相对校正因子。分别采用外标一点法和一测多评法测定上述7个活性成分含量,比较计算值与实测值的差异,以验证一测多评法的准确性和和可行性。结果: 新绿原酸、东莨菪苷、绿原酸、东莨菪内酯、异绿原酸B、异绿原酸A、异绿原酸C分别在0.028~1.420、0.019~0.956、0.027~1.324、0.014~0.720、0.017~0.824、0.010~0.500和0.013~0.672 μg·μL-1范围内呈现良好线性关系,平均加样回收率(n=6)分别为98.9%、99.0%、100.6%、101.2%、100.8%、101.7%和100.5%,RSD分别为1.1%、1.7%、1.5%、1.6%、0.55%、1.6%和1.5%。采用校正因子计算的7个活性成分含量值与外标法实测值之间无显著差异。不同丁公藤饮片中新绿原5个有机酸(新绿原酸、绿原酸、异绿原酸B、异绿原酸A、异绿原酸C)含量变化趋势基本一致,Y5(甘草汁-盐水煮品)含量最高,Y10(甘草汁-盐水晒品Ⅱ)含量最低,东莨菪苷含量以Y5含量最高(3.53 mg·g-1),Y10最低(0.31 mg·g-1)。东莨菪内酯含量以Y7(甘草汁晒品Ⅰ)含量最高(1.48 mg·g-1),Y3(甘草汁煮品Ⅱ)含量最低(0.30 mg·g-1)。结论: 以绿原酸为参照物建立的一测多评法可用于丁公藤饮片质量评价,加热和加辅料炮制均对丁公藤的化学成分产生了一定影响。

本文引用格式

杨海玲, 李雲妃, 刘振杰, 陆星宇, 潘忠旭 . 一测多评法同时测定丁公藤不同炮制品中7个活性成分含量*[J]. 药物分析杂志, 2024 , 44(3) : 395 -404 . DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2024.03.04

Abstract

Objective: To establish a method and validate its feasibility for quality evaluation of Erycibes Caulis and its processed products, and analyze the effect on the contents of the seven active ingredient before and after processing. Methods: The contents of components were determined by ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). Chlorogenic acid was chosen as the internal reference substances, the relative correction factors (RCFs) of neochlorogenic acid scopolin, scopoletin, isochlorogenic acid B, isochlorogenic acid A, isochlorogenic acid C and to chlorogenic acid were established. The contents of these seven active ingredients were determined by external standard method and quantitative analysis of multi-components by single-marker (QAMS) method. The method was evaluated by comparison of the quantitative results between external standard method and quantitative analysis of multi-components by single-marker (QAMS). Results: The peaks of neochlorogenic acid, scopolin, chlorogenic acid, scopoletin, isochlorogenic acid B, isochlorogenic acid A and isochlorogenic acid C in the sample showed good linear relationship between 0.028-1.420 μg·μL-1, 0.019-0.956 μg·μL-1, 0.027-1.324 μg·μL-1, 0.014-0.720 μg·μL-1, 0.017-0.824 μg·μL-1, 0.010-0.500 μg·μL-1 and 0.013-0.672 μg·μL-1, respectively. The average recoveries of them(n=6)were as follows 98.9%, 99.0%, 100.6%, 101.2%, 100.8%, 101.7% and 100.5%, with the RSDs of 1.1%, 1.7%, 1.5%, 1.6%, 0.55%, 1.6% and 1.5%, respectively. It was showed that no significant difference was found in the quantitative results of seven ingredients by external standard method and QAMS method. The content of 5 kinds of organic acids (neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, isochlorogenic acid B, isochlorogenic acid A and isochlorogenic acid C) in Erycibes Caulis with different processing technology showed the same change trend. The sample of Y5 (boiled products with licorice sauce and brine) had the highest contents, and the sample of Y10 (dried products Ⅱ soaked in licorice sauce and brine) had the lowest. The content of scopoline was the highest in Y5(3.53 mg·g-1), while the lowest was Y10(0.31 mg·g-1). The content of scopoletin in Y7(dried products Ⅰ with licorice sauce) was the highest(1.48 mg·g-1) and that in Y3(boiled products Ⅱ with licorice sauce) was the lowest(0.30 mg·g-1). Conclusion: The RCFs established in the QAMS methods with chlorogenic acid as the internal reference substances is accurate and feasible. It can be used to control the quality of Erycibes Caulis. Both heating and excipients preparation have a certain effect on the active ingredients in Erycibes Caulis.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国药典2020年版. 一部[S]. 2020: 3
ChP 2020. Vol I[S]. 2020: 3
[2] 钱振尧. 冯了性药酒浅谈[J]. 中成药, 1979(4): 39
QIAN ZR. Discussion of Fengliaoxing wine[J]. Chin Tradit Pat Med, 1979(4): 39
[3] 田华咏. 中国民族药炮制集成[M]. 北京: 中医古籍出版社, 2000: 35
TIAN HY. Chinese Ethnic Medicine Processing Integration[M]. Beijing: Ancient Chinese Medical Book Press, 2000: 35
[4] 刘健. 丁公藤的化学成分及生物活性研究[D]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学, 2007
LIU J. Studies on the Chemical Constituents and Bioactivities of Erycibe Obtusfolia Benth.[D]. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College, 2007
[5] 谭建宁,张贇贇. 不同来源丁公藤药材中东茛菪内酯含量的研究[J]. 中成药,2008, 30(11): 1651
TAN JN, ZHANG YY. Study on the content of scopoletin in Erycibes Caulis from different sources[J]. Chin Tradit pat Med, 2008, 30(11): 1651
[6] 杨媛媛, 谢志民, 胡静, 等. 3种丁公藤属植物中8个成分的含量测定[J]. 中南药学, 2020, 173(6): 982
YANG YY, XIE ZM, HU J, et al. Content determination of 8 compounds in 3 species of Erycibe[J]. Central South Pharm, 2020, 173(6): 982
[7] 胡静, 任慧, 崔小敏, 等. 光叶丁公藤中化学成分的UPLC-Q-Exactive Focus-MS/MS鉴定[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2020, 26(18): 124
HU J, REN H, CUI XM, et al. Identification of chemical constituents in Caulis of Erycibe schmidtii by UPLC-Q-Exactive Focus-MS/MS[J]. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Form,2020, 26(18): 124
[8] 刘小妹, 胡静, 任慧, 等. 冯了性风湿跌打药酒的化学成分鉴定[J]. 中国药房, 2020, 31(20): 2473
LIU XM, HU J, REN H, et al. Identification of chemical constituents in Fengliaoxing Fengshi Dieda wine[J]. Chin Pharm, 2020, 31(20): 2473
[9] 叶惠珍, 范椰新, 刘植蔚, 等. 丁公藤抗风湿有效成分的研究[J]. 中草药, 1981, 12(5): 5
YE HZ, FAN YX, LIU ZW, et al. Studies on the anti-rheumatic active components of Erycibes Caulis[J]. Chin Herbal Med, 1981, 12(5): 5
[10] 吴鹏, 单进军, 黄正泉, 等. 丁公藤对大鼠膝骨关节炎滑膜炎症及痛阈的影响[J]. 南京中医药大学学报, 2020, 36(6): 837
WU P, SHAN JJ, HUANG ZQ, et al. The effect of Erycibe Obtusifolia Benth. on the synovial inflammation and threshold of pain in KOA rats[J]. J Nanjing Univ Tradit Chin Med, 2020, 36(6): 837
[11] 王庆华, 杜婷婷, 张智慧, 等. 绿原酸的药理作用及机制研究进展[J]. 药学学报, 2020, 55(10): 2273
WANG QH, DU TT, ZHANG ZH, et al. Advances in pharmacological action and mechanism of chlorogenic acid[J]. Acta Pharm Sin, 2020, 55(10): 2273
[12] 梁霭湄, 陈业芳. 丁公藤注射液引起剥脱性皮炎一例[J]. 广西中医药, 1984, 7(3): 36
LIANG AM, CHEN YF. A case of exfoliative dermatitis caused by Erycibes Caulis injection[J]. Guangxi Tradit Chin Med, 1984, 7(3): 36
[13] 杨秋浪, 尤艳彩. 丁公藤注射液致过敏性休克[J]. 药物不良反应杂志,2005, 7(5):390
YANG QL, YOU YC. Anaphylactic shock due to Erycibes Caulis injection[J]. Adverse Drug React J,2005, 7(5): 390
[14] 王智民, 高惠敏, 付雪涛, 等. 一测多评法中药质量评价模式方法学研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2006, 31(23): 1925
WANG ZM, GAO HM, FU XT, et al. Multi-components quantitation by one marker new method for quality evaluation of Chinese herbal medicine[J]. China J Chin Mater Med, 2006, 31(23): 1925
[15] 杨国宁, 毕天琛, 张裕民, 等. 一测多评法测定不同肉苁蓉饮片中8个成分的含量[J]. 中药材,2020, 43(7): 1677
YANG GN, BI TC, ZHANG YM, et al. Determination of eight components in different Cistanche decoction pieces by one measurement and multiple evaluation method[J]. J Chin Med Mater, 2020, 43(7): 1677
[16] 杨海玲, 吴丽丹, 覃德杰, 等. 一测多评法同时测定广西姜黄饮片中3种姜黄素类成分含量[J]. 药物分析杂志,2016, 36(9): 1571
YANG HL, WU LD, QIN DJ, et al. Simultaneous determination of three curcumin ingredients in Curcumae Longae Rhizoma from Guangxi province by QAMS[J]. Chin J Pharm Anal, 2016, 36(9): 1571
[17] 杨海玲, 吴丽丹, 刘惠兰, 等. 一测多评法同时测定姜黄-桂枝药对不同配伍比例中5种有效化学成分含量[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2017, 37(21): 2142
YANG HL, WU LD, LIU HL, et al. Simultaneous determination of five ingredients in Curcumae longa L. -cassia twig drug pair by QAMS[J]. Chin J Hosp Pharm, 2017, 37(21): 2142
文章导航

/