质量分析

奥泽沙星皮肤外用制剂体外释放的对比研究

展开
  • 杭州华东医药集团新药研究院有限公司, 杭州 310011
第一作者 Tel:13429696581;E-mail:727576829@qq.com
* Tel:15988155280;E-mail:276515301@qq.com

收稿日期: 2022-09-06

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-21

Study on in vitro release test conditions of the topical product of ozenoxacin

Expand
  • Hangzhou Huadong Medicine Group Pharmaceutical Research Institute Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310011, China

Received date: 2022-09-06

  Online published: 2024-06-21

摘要

目的:比较试验制剂和参比制剂体外释放的一致性。方法:采用Franz扩散池法,以0.45 μm聚醚砜膜为人工膜,7 mL脱气后的Transcutol P(二乙二醇单乙醚)-水(50∶50)为接收液,转速500 r·min-1,温度32 ℃,取样体积2 mL,于0.5、1、2、4、6 h取样,以HPLC法分别测定药物在人工膜中的释放量随时间变化的释放规律,评价试验和参比制剂体外释放的一致性。结果:试验制剂与参比制剂在接收液中的累积释放百分率分别为93.7%和89.1%,单位面积累积释放量分别为2 622.0和2 479.0 μg·cm-2,二者体外释放率比值的90%置信区间在75%~133.33%(FDA一致性规定限度)范围内。结论:试验制剂与参比制剂体外释放行为一致。

本文引用格式

石玲玲, 陈轶嘉, 朱云龙 . 奥泽沙星皮肤外用制剂体外释放的对比研究[J]. 药物分析杂志, 2023 , 43(11) : 1989 -1996 . DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2023.11.23

Abstract

Objective: To compare the consistency in vitro release of test preparation and reference preparation. Methods: Franz diffusion cell method and 0.45 μm polyethersulfone membrane were used. 7 mL of degassed Transcutol P-water (50∶50) was used as the receiving liquid, the speed was 500 r·min-1, the temperature was 32 ℃, the sampling volume was 2 mL. Samples were taken at 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours, and the release amount of the drug in the artificial membrane was determined with time by HPLC method. The consistency in vitro release of test preparation and reference preparation was evaluated. Results: The cumulative release percentages of test preparation and reference preparation in the receiving solution were 93.7% and 89.1%, respectively, and the cumulative release per unit area was 2 622.0 and 2 479.0 μg·cm-2, respectively. The 90% confidence interval of the ratio of the in vitro release rate of the two was within 75%-133.33% according to FDA guidelines. Conclusion: In vitro release behavior of the test preparation is consistent with that of the reference preparation.

参考文献

[1] TATO M, LÓPEZ Y, MOROSINI MI, et al. Characterization of variables that may influence ozenoxacin in susceptibility testing, including MIC and MBC values [J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2014, 78(3):263
[2] YAMAKAWA T, MITSUYAMA J, HAYASHI K. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of T-3912, a novel non-fluorinated topical quinolone [J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2002,49(3):455
[3] LÓPEZ Y, TATO M, ESPINAL P, et al. In vitro activity of ozenoxacin against quinolone-susceptible and quinolone-resistant gram-positive bacteria [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2013, 57(12):6389
[4] LÓPEZ Y, TATO M, ESPINAL P, et al. In vitro selection of mutants resistant to ozenoxacin compared with levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in Gram-positive cocci [J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2015, 70(1):57
[5] GROPPER S, CEPERO AL, DOSIK JS, et al. Cumulative irritation, sensitizing potential, phototoxicity and photoallergy of ozenoxacin in healthy adult volunteers [J]. Future Microbiol, 2014, 9(8s):S23
[6] 安甜甜, 胡春. 奥泽沙星(Ozenoxacin, Xepi)[J]. 中国药物化学杂志, 2018, 28(4):1
AN TT, HU C. Ozenoxacin [J]. Chin J Med Chem, 2018, 28(4):1
[7] PMDA.オゼノキサシン製剤添付文書 [EB/OL]. (2021-1) [2022-12-08]. https://www.pmda.go.jp/PmdaSearch/iyakuDetail/ResultDataSetPDF/730155_2639701N1029_1_01
PMDA. Package inserts of ozenoxacin preparation [EB/OL]. (2021-1) [2022-12-08]. https://www.pmda.go.jp/PmdaSearch/iyakuDetail/ResultDataSetPDF/730155_2639701N1029_1_01
[8] 国家药监局药审中心.皮肤外用化学仿制药研究技术指导原则(试行) [EB/OL]. (2021-03-16) [2022-12-08]. https://www.cde. org. cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/4e790f4ad1cb2109 1e5a8bf4a107c535
NMPA. Technical Guidelines for the Study of Topical Chemical Generic Drugs for Skin (Trial) [EB/OL]. (2021-03-16) [2022-12-08]. https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/4e790f4ad1cb21091e5a8bf4a107c535
[9] 郭涤亮, 徐萍蔚, 王亚敏. 皮肤局部外用仿制药质量等同性评价的一般考虑[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2018, 27(18):2116
GUO DL, XU PW, WANG YM. Considerations on quality equivalence evaluation of generic topical dermatologic drugs [J]. Chin J New Drugs, 2018, 27(18):2116
[10] 武余波, 黄乐乐, 卢望丁,等. 皮肤局部外用制剂Q3等同性研究技术要点解析[J]. 中国医药工业杂志, 2022, 53(5):601
WU YB, HUANG LL, LU WD, et al. Analysis of technical points on topical dermatologic drugs for Q3 equivalence study [J]. Chin J Pharm, 2022, 53(5):601
[11] 邵鹏, 郑金琪, 潘芳芳, 等. 外用半固体制剂的体外释放试验和等效性评价[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2021, 38(20):2481
SHAO P, ZHENG JQ, PAN FF, et al. In vitro release tests and equivalence evaluation for topical semisolid dosage forms [J]. Chin J Mod Appl Pharm, 2021, 38(20):2481
[12] FDA. Nonsterile semisolid dosage forms scale-up and post-approval changes:chemistry,manufacturing and controls; in vitro release testing and in vivo bioequivalence documentation [EB/OL]. (1997-05) [2022-12-08]. https://www.fda.gov/media/71141/download
[13] EMA. Draft guideline on quality and equivalence of topical products [EB/OL]. (2018-10-18) [2022-12-08]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/draft-guideline-quality-equivalence-topical-products_en.pdf
[14] FDA. Draft guidance on acyclovir [EB/OL]. (2016-12) [2022-12-08]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/psg/Acyclovir_topical%20cream_RLD%2021478_RV12-16.pdf
[15] FDA. Product quality review(S) [EB/OL]. (2017-12-01) [2022-12-08]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/208945Orig1s000ChemR.pdf
文章导航

/