快速分析

冬虫夏草与蛹虫草的表面增强拉曼光谱结合化学计量学鉴定研究*

展开
  • 北华大学药学院, 吉林 132013
第一作者 Tel:13844864756;E-mail:1448646085@qq.com
**Tel:(0432)64608281;E-mail:sunjingbo@beihua.edu.cn

修回日期: 2022-02-25

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-26

基金资助

*吉林省科技厅重点科技研发项目(20180201049NY);吉林省卫生与健康技术创新项目(2020J015);吉林省科技厅医药健康产业发展专项(20210401129YY);北华大学研究生创新计划项目(北华研创合字[2021]067号)

Identification of Cordyceps sinensis and Cordyceps militaris by surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy with chemometric analysis*

Expand
  • School of Pharmacy, Beihua University, Jilin 132013, China

Revised date: 2022-02-25

  Online published: 2024-06-26

摘要

目的: 利用表面增强拉曼光谱和化学计量学方法(surface enhanced laser Raman spectroscopy, SERS)对冬虫夏草(Cordyceps sinensis)和不同来源蛹虫草(Cordyceps militaris,柞蚕、大米培养蛹虫草和野生蛹虫草)进行定性研究,以建立一种可快速鉴定冬虫夏草和蛹虫草的方法。方法: 设置激光拉曼光谱仪的光谱测量范围0~3 200 cm-1,激光波长633 nm,总功率20 mW,物镜50倍,激发光源的强度为0.5%,扫描时间1 min,采集样品经表面增强技术处理前后的激光拉曼光谱,应用Origin 8.0软件对光谱进行降噪和归一化处理;进一步通过方差分析结合聚类分析和主成分分析,建立冬虫夏草与蛹虫草的品种判定方法。结果: 4种样品的SERS有7个共有峰:150、228、812、934、1 041、1 395、2 929 cm-1,其中冬虫夏草的150、228、812、934 cm-1 4个吸收峰强度显著弱于蛹虫草,而1 041、2 929 cm-1 2个吸收峰强度显著强于蛹虫草;3种蛹虫草在1 625~2 929cm-1范围内均有较强的吸收峰,而冬虫夏草则没有。主成分分析和聚类分析结果表明,3种蛹虫草归为一类,冬虫夏草为一类。结论: 本方法操作简便、快速准确、检测过程无损,所得图谱特征及区别明显,可用于冬虫夏草和蛹虫草的定性鉴定。

本文引用格式

孙佳慧, 冯源, 王珊, 盛瑜, 安丽萍, 杜培革, 孙晶波 . 冬虫夏草与蛹虫草的表面增强拉曼光谱结合化学计量学鉴定研究*[J]. 药物分析杂志, 2022 , 42(4) : 727 -733 . DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2022.04.22

Abstract

Objective: To establish a method for rapid identification of C.sinensis and C.militaris by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy(SERS) and chemometric methods to qualitatively study C.sinensis and C.militaris from different sources(tussah, rice-cultured C.militaris and natural C.militaris). Methods: The spectral measurement range of the laser Raman spectrometer was 0-3 200 cm-1, the laser wavelength was 633 nm, the total power was 20 mW, the objective lens was 50 times, the intensity of the excitation light source was 0.5%, and the scanning time was about 1 min. The laser Raman spectra of the samples before and after surface enhancement technology were collected and Origin 8.0 software was used to denoise and normalize the spectra. Furthermore, a method for judging the species of C.sinensis and C.militaris was established by means of variance analysis combined with cluster analysis and principal component analysis. Results: The SERS of the four samples had seven common peaks at 150, 228, 812, 934, 1 041, 1 395 and 2 929 cm-1. The absorption peaks of C.sinensis (150, 228, 812 and 934 cm-1) were significantly weaker than those of C.militaris, while the absorption peaks at 1 041 and 2 929 cm-1 were significantly stronger than that of C.militaris. All the three species of C.militaris had strong absorption peaks in the range of 1 625-2 929 cm-1, while C.sinensis didn’t have. The results of principal component analysis and clustering analysis showed that the three species of C.militaris were classified as one type and C.sinensis as one type. Conclusion: The method is easy to operate, fast and accurate, the detection process is non-destructive, the characteristics and differences of the obtained spectra are obvious, and it can be used for the qualitative identification of C.sinensis and C.militaris.

参考文献

[1] 黄彪, 程元柳, 曹秀君, 等. 冬虫夏草及其混淆品HPLC指纹图谱研究及共有成分鉴定[J].中草药, 2017, 48(5): 991
HUANG B, CHENG YL, CAO XJ, et al. Study on HPLC fingerprint and identification of common components of Cordyceps sinensis and its adulterants[J].Chin J Pharm Anal, 2017, 48(5): 991
[2] 苏燕燕, 李文佳, 杨俐, 等. 冬虫夏草及虫草类产品DNA条形码鉴定研究[J].中国中药杂志, 2019, 44(10):1965
SU YY, LI WJ, YANG L, et al. Identification of Cordyceps sinensis and Cordyceps products by DNA barcode[J].China J Chin Mater Med, 2019, 44(10): 1965
[3] 曹静, 黄彪, 白静, 等. 冬虫夏草质量标志物―虫草多肽的分离与鉴定研究[J].时珍国医国药, 2018, 29(11): 2667
CAO J, HUANG B, BAI J, et al. Isolation and identification of Cordyceps polypeptide, a quality marker of Cordyceps sinensis[J].Lishizhen Med Mater Med Res, 2018, 29(11): 2667
[4] 薛亚甫, 吴蕾蕾, 张倩, 等. 北虫草中6种核苷类成分的含量测定与质量控制[J].中国新药与临床杂志, 2016, 35(11): 796
XUE YF, WU LL, ZHANG Q, et al. Content determination and quality control of 6 nucleoside components in Cordyceps militaris[J].Chin J New Drugs Clin, 2016, 35(11): 796
[5] 吴信子, 王思宏, 吴丽花, 等. 不同鹿茸片红外数据的聚类分析[J].安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(35): 20123
WU XZ, WANG SH, WU LH, et al. Cluster analysis of infrared data of different antler pieces [J].Anhui Agric Sci, 2010, 38(35): 20123
[6] 俞允, 何雁, 陈伟炜, 等. 拉曼光谱在中药检测中的研究进展[J].江西中医学院学报, 2013, 25(2): 85
YU Y, HE Y, CHEN WW, et al. Research progress of Raman spectroscopy in the detection of traditional Chinese medicine[J].J Jiangxi Univ Tradit Chin Med, 2013, 25(2): 85
[7] LEE PC, MEISEL D. Adsorption and surface-enhanced Raman of dyes on silver and gold sols[J].J Phys Chem, 1982, 86(17): 3391
[8] 许以明. 拉曼光谱及其在结构生物学中的应用[M].北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005:3
XU YM. Raman Spectroscopy in Application of Structure Bioligy[M].Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2005: 3
[9] 卫程华, 陈娟, 许曼翎, 等. 表面增强拉曼光谱法快速分析中药三七的有效成分[J].江苏大学学报(医学版), 2015, 25 (3): 263
WEI CH, CHEN J, XU ML, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for rapid analysis of the effective components of the traditional Chinese medicine Panax notoginseng[J].J Jiangsu Univ(Med Ed), 2015, 25(3): 263
[10] 董晶晶, 陈娟, 戈延茹, 等. 激光拉曼光谱法无损鉴别三七及其伪品[J].激光与光电子学进展, 2014, 51(5): 204
DONG JJ, CHEN J, GE YR, et al. Nondestructive identification of Panax notoginseng and its counterfeit products by laser Raman spectroscopy[J].Prog Laser Optoelectron, 2014, 51(5): 204
[11] 胡建勇, 缪明锦, 闻焜, 等. 基于红外光谱结合化学计量学及HPLC色谱的紫丹参及其近缘种成分差异[J].中国实验方剂学杂志, 2019, 25(15): 8
HU JY, MIAO MJ, WEN K, et al. Composition differences of purple Salvia miltiorrhiza and its related species based on infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics and HPLC chromatography[J].Chin J Exp Tradit Med Form, 2019, 25 (15): 8
[12] 李宁, 庄正飞, 郭周义, 等. 拉曼光谱技术及其在中医药鉴定中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志, 2012, 29(1): 3173
LI N, ZHUANG ZF, GUO ZY, et al. Raman spectroscopy and its application in the identification of traditional Chinese medicine[J].Chin J Med Phys, 2012, 29(1): 3173
文章导航

/