生物检定

短肽型肠内营养剂相对分子质量分布及体外消化稳定性的探析*

  • 郭文琪 ,
  • 王晗 ,
  • 王奕涵 ,
  • 严玲玲 ,
  • 谢智勇
展开
  • 1.中山大学药学院(深圳),深圳 518107;
    2.深圳万和制药有限公司,深圳 518107
第一作者 Tel:13602450230;E-mail:guowq9@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
**谢智勇 Tel:18620761811;E-mail:xiezhy@mail.sysu.edu.cn
严玲玲 Tel:13925262432;E-mail:yanlingling@wanhe-phar.com

收稿日期: 2024-06-26

  网络出版日期: 2025-08-25

基金资助

*广东省肠道微生态制剂企业重点实验室基金项目(2022B1212020004); 深圳市新型口服固体制剂工程研究中心基金项目(XMHT20220104010)

Analysis of the relative molecular mass distribution and in vitro digestive stability of short-peptide-based enteral nutrition*

  • GUO Wen-qi ,
  • WANG Han ,
  • WANG Yi-han ,
  • YAN Ling-ling ,
  • XIE Zhi-yong
Expand
  • 1. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat - sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China;
    2. Shenzhen Wanhe Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518107, China

Received date: 2024-06-26

  Online published: 2025-08-25

摘要

目的: 建立1种结合优化后的Infogest体外消化静态模型的分子排阻色谱(SEC)法,测定短肽型肠内营养剂消化前后相对分子质量分布,对3种不同的短肽型肠内营养剂质量进行考察评估,探讨产品质量特性及消化稳定性,为短肽型肠内营养剂质量控制和临床个体化应用提供指导依据。方法: SEC法采用2根ECOSIL SEC G 2000色谱柱(300 mm×7.8 mm, 5 μm)串联,以乙腈-水-三氟乙酸(15 ∶ 85 ∶ 0.1)为流动相,流速0.7 mL · min-1,柱温 30 ℃,检测波长215 nm,进样量20 μL;体外模拟消化参考并优化Infogest体外消化静态模型,分为模拟胃、肠和胃肠总消化3个阶段,并采用建立的SEC法,对比消化前后相对分子质量分布的变化来评价其体外消化稳定性。结果: 在相对分子质量为165.19~12 327,8种对照品的相对分子质量对数与保留时间呈良好的线性关系。专属性试验结果显示,空白溶剂、模拟胃肠混合消化溶液对相对分子质量分布测定基本无影响;精密度、重复性、24 h稳定性试验的RSD均<1.0%。各品种短肽型肠内营养剂的相对分子质量主要集中在150~1 000,但不同品种的相对分子质量分布占比存在较大差异。肽组分的水解主要发生在生产阶段,经体外模拟消化后,其相对分子质量分布特性基本保持不变,变化程度主要与产品的原始水解程度相关。结论: SEC法结合经优化的Infogest体外消化静态模型,适用于短肽型肠内营养剂经消化前后的相对分子质量分布及消化稳定性研究,此方法操作简便、快捷,有利于该产品质量特性和营养价值的综合性评估。

本文引用格式

郭文琪 , 王晗 , 王奕涵 , 严玲玲 , 谢智勇 . 短肽型肠内营养剂相对分子质量分布及体外消化稳定性的探析*[J]. 药物分析杂志, 2025 , 45(2) : 218 -227 . DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2024-0424

Abstract

Objective: To establish a method combining size exclusion chromatography (SEC) with an optimized Infogest in vitro static digestion model for determining the relative molecular mass distribution of short-peptide-based enteral nutrition before and after digestion. To evaluate and assess the quality of three different products, to explore product quality characteristics and digestive stability, and to provide guidance for quality control and clinical individualized application of short-peptide-based enteral nutrition. Methods: The SEC method was performed using two ECOSIL SEC G 2000 columns (300 mm×7.8 mm, 5 μm) in series, with acetonitrile-water-trifluoroacetic acid (15 ∶ 85 ∶ 0.1) as the mobile phase, a flow rate of 0.7 mL · min-1, the column temperature 30 ℃, the detection wavelength 215 nm, and the sample volume 20 μL. The in vitro simulated digestion process referred to and optimized the Infogest in vitro static digestion model, divided into simulated gastric digestion, simulated intestinal digestion, and simulated gastro-intestinal total digestion stages. The established SEC method was used to compare changes in the relative molecular mass distribution before and after digestion to evaluate in vitro digestive stability. Results: Within the range of relative molecular mass from 165.19 to 12 327, the logarithms of the relative molecular mass of the 8 reference standards showed good linear relationships with retention time. Specificity tests indicated that blank solvent and the simulated gastric-intestinal digestion solution had minimal impact on the measurement of relative molecular mass distribution. The RSDs for precision, repeatability, and 24 h stability tests were all less than 1.0%. The relative molecular mass of various short peptide enteral nutrition products was mainly concentrated between 150 and 1 000, but there were significant differences in the distribution ratios of relative molecular mass among different products. The hydrolysis of peptide components primarily occurred during the production stage, and after in vitro simulated digestion, their relative molecular mass distribution characteristics remained largely unchanged, with the degree of change mainly related to the original hydrolysis level of the product. Conclusion: The SEC method combined with the optimized Infogest model is suitable for studying the molecular mass distribution and digestive stability of short-peptide-based enteral nutrition. The method is straightforward and rapid, facilitating a comprehensive assessment of the products quality characteristics and nutritional value.

参考文献

[1] CEDERHOLM T,BARAZZONI R,AUSTIN P,et al.ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition[J].Clin Nutr,2017,36(1):49
[2] SAVINO P.Knowledge of constituent ingredients in enteral nutrition formulas can make a difference in patient response to enteral feeding[J].Nutr Clin Pract,2018,33(1):90
[3] DOLEY J.Enteral nutrition overview[J].Nutrients,2022,14(11):2180
[4] 曹文红,章超桦.生物活性肽的吸收机制[J].药物生物技术,2006,13(5):384
CAO WH,ZHANG CH.The absorption mechanism of bioactive peptides[J].Pharm Biotechnol,2006,13(5):384
[5] DANIEL H.Molecular and integrative physiology of intestinal peptide transport[J].Annu Rev Physiol,2004,66:361
[6] SHIMIZU M,TSUNOGAI M,ARAI S.Transepithelial transport of oligopeptides in the human intestinal cell,Caco-2[J].Peptides,1997,18(5):681
[7] GRIMBLE G,SARDA M,SESSAY HF,et al.The influence of whey hydrolysate peptide chain length on nitrogen and carbohydrate absorption in the perfused human jejunum[J].Clin Nutr,1994,13(Suppl 1):46
[8] 吴冬梅,唐良艳,黄志玲,等.几种多肽在大鼠离体小肠中的吸收[J].药物生物技术,2007,14(5):356
WU DM,TANG LY,HUANG ZL,et al.The absorption of several peptides in the isolated small intestine of rats[J].Pharm Biotechnol,2007,14(5):356
[9] LIU C,KOU Y,ZHANG X,et al.Strategies and industrial perspectives to improve oral absorption of biological macromolecules[J].Expert Opin Drug Del,2018,15(3):223
[10] TIAMBENG TN,WU Z,MELBY JA,et al.Size exclusion chromatography strategies and MASH explorer for large proteoform characterization[M] // SUN LL,LIU XW.Proteoform Identification:Methods and Protocols.New York:Springer US,2022:15
[11] SOME D,AMARTELY H,TSADOK A,et al.Characterization of proteins by size-exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle light scattering(SEC-MALS)[J].J Vis Exp,2019,148:e59615
[12] 蒋腾川,宋新波,张丽娟.凝胶过滤色谱法测定3种不同来源多肽的相对分子质量分布[J].食品科学,2014,35(24):312
JIANG TC,SONG XB,ZHANG LJ.Determination of relative molecular weight distribution of polypeptides from three different sources by gel filtration chromatography[J].Food Sci,2014,35(24):312
[13] DÁVILA LEÓN R,GONZÁLEZ-VÁZQUEZ M,LIMA-VILLEGAS KE,et al.In vitro gastrointestinal digestion methods of carbohydrate-rich foods[J].Food Sci Nutr,2024,12(2):722
[14] BRODKORB A,EGGER L,ALMINGER M,et al.INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion[J].Nat Protoc,2019,14(4):991
[15] GIROMINI C,CHELI F,REBUCCI R,et al.Invited review:dairy proteins and bioactive peptides:modeling digestion and the intestinal barrier[J].J Dairy Sci,2019,102(2):929
[16] GARVEY SM,GUICE JL,HOLLINS MD,et al.Fungal digestive enzymes promote macronutrient hydrolysis in the INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of digestion[J].Food Chem,2022,386:132777
[17] LIMKETKAI BN,SHAH ND,SHEIKH GN,et al.Classifying enteral nutrition:tailored for clinical practice[J].Curr Gastroenterol Rep,2019,21(9):47
[18] 游义娇,佟平,袁娟丽,等.食物蛋白质体外消化模型研究进展[J].食品工业科技,2017,38(6):381
YOU YJ,TONG P,YUAN JL,et al.Progress on in vitro model for protein digestion[J].Sci Technol Food Ind,2017,38(6):381
[19] SAADI S,SAARI N,ANWAR F,et al.Recent advances in food biopeptides:Production,biological functionalities and therapeutic applications[J].Biotechnol Adv,2015,33(1):80
[20] 黄梦君,许淑芳.食源性低聚肽的消化吸收机制及营养功能的研究进展[J].中国食物与营养,2021,27(10):55
HUANG MJ,XU SF.Advances in the digestion,absorption mechanisms,and nutritional functions of dietary oligopeptides[J].Food Nutr China,2021,27(10):55
文章导航

/